JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)June 25, 2002

A- de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Rodrigo Escobar Gil

✓Claimant Manuela Astrid Aragon Melgarejo

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Superior jerárquico común
  • Jueces de una misma categoría y del mismo distrito judicial
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se abstuvo de resolver el conflicto de competencias suscitado entre el Juzgado Segundo Civil del Circuito de Barranquilla y el Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Barranquilla, Sala Laboral, toda vez que es el citado Tribunal, a través de sus Salas Mixtas, la autoridad competente para decidir el conflicto de la referencia.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. ABSTENERSE de resolver el conflicto de competencias suscitado entre el Juzgado
  2. Segundo. Civil del Circuito de Barranquilla y el Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Barranquilla, Sala Laboral.
  3. Segundo. DECLARAR que el Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Barranquilla, a traves de sus Salas Mixtas, es la autoridad competente para decidir el conflicto de competencias suscitado entre el Juzgado
  4. Segundo. Civil del Circuito de Barranquilla y el Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Barranquilla, Sala Laboral.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.