A- de 2002
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Rodrigo Escobar Gil
✓Claimant Edgar Rico Briñez
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Carácter absoluto de cosa juzgada
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Se confirmó en su integridad el auto proferido por el Magistrado Sustanciador, mediante el cual se rechazó la demanda interpuesta por el ciudadano de la referencia, quien demandó la inexequibilidad del inciso segundo del Art. 1º de la Ley 57 de 1926, toda vez que según lo establecido en el Art. 6º del Decreto 2067 de 1991, las demandas que recaigan sobre disposiciones amparadas por una sentencia que haya hecho tránsito a cosa juzgada constitucional deben ser rechazadas.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- CONFIRMAR en su integridad el Auto de veintiuno (21) de mayo de 2002, proferido por el Magistrado Sustanciador Jaime Córdoba Triviño, mediante el cual se rechaza la demanda interpuesta por el ciudadano Edgar Rico Briñez.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.