JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)November 3, 1999

A- de 1999

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓Claimant Ernesto Rey Cantor

✓
Topic · hard data
Acumulacion De Procesos.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acumulacion De Procesos De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Improcedencia por no estar en el mismo programa mensual de trabajo y reparto
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

No se accedió a la acumulación solicitada por el ciudadano de la referencia, toda vez que conforme con el Acuerdo No. 05 de 1992, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional, puede disponer la acumulación de aquellos procesos incluidos en el respectivo programa mensual de trabajo y reparto, cuando en ellos se dé una coincidencia total o parcial de las normas acusadas y la medida se solicite al momento de la aprobación del programa por la Sala.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. RESUELVE:
  2. No acceder a la acumulación solicitada por el ciudadano Ernesto Rey Cantor.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.