JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)April 12, 2005

A- de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Rodrigo Escobar Gil

✓Claimant Ivan Dario Lopez Calle

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Juzgado Catorce Civil Del Circuito De Medellín Y El Tribunal Contenciso Administrativo De Antioquia. Ordena Al Juzgado Catorce Civil Del Circuito De Medellín Iniciar El Tramite De La Accion De Tutela
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Asunción por Corte Constitucional cuando no existe superior jerárquico común
Accion De Tutela Contra El Icfes
  • Inobservancia del Decreto 2591 de 1991
  • Orden para iniciar de forma inmediata su trámite
  • Rechazo de plano cuando no se corrige dentro del término de tres días
  • Suspensión de la decisión desconoce la falta de competencia del juez
2 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. Dejar sin efecto el Auto del catorce (14) de febrero de 2005, proferido por el Juzgado Catorce Civil del Circuito de Medellin, dentro de la accion de tutela promovida por el senor Ivan Dario Lopez Calle.
  2. SEGUNDO. Ordenar al Juzgado Catorce Civil del Circuito de Medellin, que inicie, de forma inmediata, el tramite de la accion de tutela de la referencia conforme a las previsiones del articulo 86 de la Constitucion Politica y del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.