JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)June 29, 2000

A- de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓Claimant Jorge Rodriguez Romero

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencias.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Jueces de distintos distritos judiciales
  • Asunción por Corte Constitucional cuando no existe superior jerárquico común
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se remitió el expediente a la Corte Suprema de Justicia, Sala de Casación Civil y Agraria, para que defina cuál de los dos juzgados municipales es competente para conocer de la tutela incoada por el accionante contra el Seguro Social, toda vez que teniendo en cuenta que el conflicto negativo de competencias ha surgido entre dos juzgados, a cuya cabeza se encuentra, como superior común, la mencionada Corporación.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. REMITASE el expediente a la Corte Suprema de Justicia, Sala de Casacion Civil y Agraria, para que ella defina cual de los dos juzgados municipales es competente para conocer de la accion de tutela incoada por Jorge Rodriguez Romero contra el Seguro Social.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.