JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)April 14, 2010

A- de 2010

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Nilson Elías Pinilla Pinilla

✓Claimant Luz Dary Guzman·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Corte Constitucional
  • Competencia excepcional para asegurar cumplimiento de fallo de tutela
Cumplimiento Fallo De Tutela
  • Competencia del juez de primera instancia
Accion De Tutela Contra Junta Nacional Y Regional De Invalidez Y Seguro Social Pensiones
  • Competencia de Juzgado Civil del Circuito para abrir incidente de desacato en sentencia T-062/09
4 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Incidente de desacato de la sentencia T 062/09.

La Corte no advierte en este caso la necesidad de tramitar el desacato por parte de esta corporación, se decide no asumir la petición y remitir el expediente al juzgado que conoció de la tutela en primera instancia.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. NO ASUMIR la petición de iniciar incidente de desacato, presentada nuevamente por la señora Luz Dary Guzmán.
  2. Segundo. REMITIR al Juzgado Treinta y Nueve Civil del Circuito de Bogotá la solicitud de abrir el incidente de desacato frente a la sentencia T-062 de 2009, para que determine lo que estime pertinente.
  3. Tercero. INFORMAR al solicitante esta decisión, por intermedio de la Secretaría General de esta corporación.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.