JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)March 14, 2007

A- de 2007

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Nilson Elías Pinilla Pinilla

✓Claimant Ana Joaquina Triana Melo Vs. Iss Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Tribunal Administrativo De Cundinamarca Seccion Segunda Subseccion D, El Juzgado Quinto Civil Del Circuito De Bogota Y El Tribunal Superior Del Distrito Judicial De Bogota Sala Civil. Ordena Remitir El Expediente Al Tribunal Administrativo De Cundinamarca Seccion Segunda Subseccion D
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Competencia A Prevencion En Tutela Y Principio Perpetuatio Jurisdictionis
  • Conocimiento del Tribunal Administrativo de Cundinamarca en primera instancia
Accion De Tutela Contra Autoridad Publica Del Orden Nacional
  • Competencia del Tribunal Superior, Administrativo y Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura
Accion De Tutela Contra Autoridades De Diferente Nivel
  • Competencia del juez de mayor jerarquía
Competencia A Prevención En Tutela
  • Lugar donde ocurrió amenaza o vulneración de derechos fundamentales o donde se produjeron sus efectos
Instituto De Seguro Social
  • Empresa Industrial y Comercial del Estado del orden nacional según Decreto 2148 de 1992
Ministerio De Hacienda Y Credito Publico
  • Dependencia del orden nacional del sector central
8 topics · 9 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Remitir el expediente de la referencia, por intermedio de la Secretaria General, al Tribunal Administrativo de Cundinamarca, Seccion Segunda, Sub Seccion D, para que en ejercicio de sus competencias constitucionales y legales, tramite y decida la accion de tutela instaurada por la senora Ana Joaquina Triana Melo, contra el Seguro Social Pensiones, el Ministerio de Hacienda y Credito Publico y la Beneficencia de Cundinamarca.
  2. Informese esta decision, ademas, al Juzgado
  3. Quinto. Civil del Circuito de Bogota y al Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Bogota, Sala Civil.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.