JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 20, 1999

A- de 1999

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant Julian David Muñoz Florez

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia De Tutela
  • Jueces de una misma jurisdicción y distintos distritos judiciales
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se ordenó remitir el expediente en referencia a la Sala de Casación Civil y Agraria de la Corte Suprema de Justicia para que defina cuál de los dos juzgados de familia de los diferentes circuitos es competente para conocer de la tutela incoada por el accionante, toda vez que en su calidad de superior jerárquico común, es quien debe resolver el conflicto de competencia de orden territorial suscitado entre los aludidos despachos judiciales, de conformidad con lo dispuesto en los Art. 4 del Decreto 306 de 1992 y 28 del Código de Procedimiento Civil.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Corte Constitucional, en Sala Plena
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. REMITASE por Secretaria General el expediente en referencia a la Sala de Casacion Civil y Agraria de la H. Corte Suprema de Justicia para que defina cual de los dos juzgados de familia de los diferentes circuitos es competente para conocer de la accion de tutela incoada por el joven JULIAN DAVID MUNOZ FLOREZ.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.