JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)February 17, 2016

A- de 2016

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Linares Cantillo

✓Claimant Adriana Diaz Padilla Y Otro

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Recurso De Suplica Contra Auto Que Rechaza Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Se confirma en su integridad el auto recurrido
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recurso de súplica interpuesto en contra del auto que rechazó la demanda de inconstitucionalidad de la referencia, por cuanto las falencias señaladas en el auto de inadmisión no fueron subsanadas por los demandantes.

Considera la Sala Plena que en el escrito de corrección se reitera la argumentación que había sido desestimada por el Magistrado Sustanciador, sin presentar ningún fundamento para desvirtuar o controvertir los motivos del rechazo.

Se CONFIRMA íntegramente el auto recurrido.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (21 points)
  1. CONFIRMAR, integramente, el Auto del quince (15) de enero de dos mil dieciseis (2016) dictado por el Magistrado Sustanciador, Luis Guillermo Guerrero Perez, por medio del cual rechazo la demanda de inconstitucionalidad, con radicacion D-11109, por las consideraciones expuestas en la presente providencia.
  2. MARIA VICTORIA CALLE CORREA
  3. Presidente (E)
  4. LUIS GUILLERMO GUERRERO PEREZ
  5. Magistrado
  6. No interviene
  7. ALEJANDRO LINARES CANTILLO
  8. Magistrado
  9. GABRIEL EDUARDO MENDOZA MARTELO
  10. Magistrado
  11. GLORIA STELLA ORTIZ DELGADO
  12. Magistrada
  13. JORGE IVAN PALACIO PALACIO
  14. Magistrado
  15. JORGE IGNACIO PRETELT CHALJUB
  16. Magistrado
  17. ALBERTO ROJAS RIOS
  18. Magistrado
  19. LUIS ERNESTO VARGAS SILVA
  20. Magistrado
  21. MARTHA VICTORIA SACHICA MENDEZ
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
Alejandro Linares Cantillo
Reporting justice
✓
Alberto Rojas Ríos
Magistrado
✓
Gabriel Eduardo Mendoza Martelo
Magistrado
✓
Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado
Magistrado
✓
Jorge Ignacio Pretelt Chaljub
Magistrado
✓
Jorge Iván Palacio Palacio
Magistrado
✓
Luis Ernesto Vargas Silva
Magistrado
✓
Luis Guillermo Guerrero Pérez
Magistrado
✓
María Victoria Calle Correa
Presidente
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
← cites 0cited by 1 →A. 064/16A. 1774/24A. 1774/242024
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by1

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.