A- de 2001
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Fabio Morón Díaz
✓Claimant Ramon Egidio Londoño Mazo Y Otra
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Se inaplicó el Art. 1º del Decreto 1382 de 12 de julio de 2000 por inconstitucional.
En consecuencia, se ordenó remitir el expediente al Juzgado Promiscuo de Familia de Yarumal, Antioquía, para que asuma el conocimiento de la acción de tutela instaurada por los ciudadanos de la referencia contra el Ministerio de Educación Nacional y Otros.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- En merito de lo expuesto la Corte Constitucional en Sala Plena,
- RESUELVE:
- En el presente caso, INAPLICAR, por inconstitucional el Decreto 1382 de 2000. En consecuencia, remitase el expediente al Juzgado Promiscuo de Familia de Yarumal, Antioquia, para que asuma el conocimiento de la accion de tutela instaurada por los ciudadanos RAMON EGIDIO LONDONO MAZO y DINORA EUGENIA LEZCANO A., contra el Ministerio de Educacion Nacional y Otros.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.