JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)April 6, 2011

A- de 2011

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Nilson Elías Pinilla Pinilla

✓Claimant Jose Joaquin Gori Cabrera

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion Publica De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Derecho del ciudadano a participar en la conformación, ejercicio y control del poder político
  • Requisitos
Recurso De Suplica Contra Auto Que Rechaza Demanda Al Estatuto De Vigilancia Y Seguridad Privada
  • Rechazar por pretender enmendar inactividad y revivir oportunidad procesal
Recurso De Suplica
  • Termino de interposición
4 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recurso de súplica interpuesto contra el Auto del ocho de marzo de 2011 proferido por el Magistrado Jorge Iván Palacio Palacio..

La Corte determina que el rechazo se debió a la propia inactividad del demandante, ya que incumplió la carga procesal que le asistía de corregir los defectos sustanciales o formales anotados en el auto inadmisorio, por lo tanto se resuelve confirmar el auto recurrido.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. CONFIRMAR el auto de marzo 8 de 2011, mediante el cual fue rechazada la demanda presentada por el ciudadano Jose Joaquin Gori Cabrera.
  2. En firme este auto, contra el cual no procede recurso alguno, archivese el expediente.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.