JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)March 23, 2010

A- de 2010

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice María Victoria Calle Correa

✓Claimant Bernardo Augusto Santos Giraldo

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recusación contra los magistrados de la Sala Primera de Revisión, el actor interpuso el recurso contra todos los magistrados de esta corporación “en el eventual caso en que sus familiares hasta cuarto grado de consaguinidad ostenten contratos con el Gobierno Nacional y/o el sector de las Telecomunicaciones”, en cuanto al Dr.

Mauricio González Cuervo alegó relación en grado de consanguinidad con su exesposa, quien para la época de los hechos era abogada de Telecom y asesora del Gobierno, el Dr.

González manifestó que no se encuentra dentro de las causales previstas en el artículo 56 del Código de Procedimiento Penal, ni le asiste ninguna de las causales de impedimento.

Se rechaza por improcedente la recusación formulada por el actor.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Rechazar por improcedente la recusación formulada por el señor Bernardo Augusto Giraldo contra el magistrado Mauricio González Cuervo.
  2. Segundo. Contra esta decisión no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.