JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)April 10, 2013

A- de 2013

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alexei Egor Julio Estrada

✓Claimant Judith Bethzabeth Collazos Garzon

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

4 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recurso de Súplica interpuesto contra el auto del 25 de febrero de 2013, dictado en el proceso de la referencia por el magistrado Jorge Ignacio Pretelt Chaljub.

A través del referido auto el magistrado sustanciado decidió rechazar la demanda de inconstitucionalidad presentada por la memorialista, al considerar que no se corrigió de manera adecuada y que la demandante persistió en idéntica argumentación a la presentada en su escrito primigenio.

La Sala considera que el recurso de súplica no presenta argumentos que desvirtúen las razones constitutivas del rechazo de la demanda y, de manera consecuente, decide confirmar la decisión recurrida.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR el auto del 25 de febrero de 2013, proferido por el magistrado Jorge Ignacio Pretelt Chaljub, que rechazó la demanda de inconstitucionalidad de la referencia, formulada por la ciudadana Judith Bethzabeth Collazos Garzón.
  2. SEGUNDO. Ejecutoriada esta decisión, archívese el expediente.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.