A- de 2014
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Mauricio González Cuervo
✓Claimant Dario Angarita Medellin Y Otro
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Procedencia dentro del año siguiente a su promulgación
- La caducidad opera inexorablemente cualquiera sea el vicio de que se trate y en consecuencia pierde la Corte Constitucional su competencia para pronunciarse de fondo
- Vicios de competencia
- Recurso de súplica
- Rechazar recurso de súplica por caducidad de la acción
- Requisitos
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Recurso de súplica interpuesto en contra del auto que resolvió rechazar la demanda de la referencia, por darse la caducidad de la acción de inconstitucionalidad, de conformidad con el inciso 3º del artículo 6º del Decreto 2067 de 1991.
Se confirma el auto recurrido.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. CONFIRMAR el auto proferido el once (11) de febrero de dos mil catorce (2014), por medio del cual se rechazo la demanda No. D-10094.
- Segundo. Contra esta providencia no cabe recurso alguno.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.