JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 18, 1998

A- de 1998

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Fabio Morón Díaz

✓Claimant Hernan Olano Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Recusacion Contra Magistrado.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se ordenó poner en conocimiento al Ministerio de Educación Nacional por intermedio del Tribunal respectivo sobre la nulidad saneable derivada de no habérsele notificado la iniciación de la presente acción de tutela, al ser considerado un tercero con interés legítimo en el proceso.

Agotado el procedimiento, fuere o no alegada la nulidad, devuélvase el expediente a esta Corte para su revisión.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (2 points)
  1. Primero. Poner en conocimiento de la Nacion -Ministerio de Educacion Nacional-, por intermedio del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Medellin -Sala Laboral-, la nulidad saneable derivada de no habersele notificado la iniciacion de la presente accion de tutela, advirtiendole que, si la alegan dentro de los tres (3) dias siguientes a la notificacion de este auto, se declarara la nulidad de lo actuado a partir del auto admisorio y se tramitara nuevamente la tutela, con plena observancia de las garantias propias del debido proceso. Si la nulidad no es alegada quedara saneada y el proceso continuara su curso.
  2. Segundo. Agotado el procedimiento al que se refiere el numeral anterior, fuere o no alegada la nulidad, devuelvase el expediente a esta Sala para su revision.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.