Order (Auto)February 21, 2001

A- de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

✓Claimant Willinton Eduardo Pulido Ibañez Y Otro

✓

Topic · hard data

Conflicto De Competencia

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela

Decreto Reglamentario De Competencia Para Reparto De Accion De Tutela

Inaplicación

2 topics · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index

Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se inaplicó en relación con las acciones de tutela a que se refiere esta providencia el Art. 1º del Decreto 1382 de 12 de julio de 2000, por ser contrario a la Constitución.

En tal sentido, se ordenó remitir la tutela propuesta por los ciudadanos de la referencia contra la Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia, al Tribunal Contencioso Administrativo de Boyacá por ser ese despacho judicial ante el cual se interpuso la acción de tutela en referencia.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

Primero. Inaplicar, en relacion con las acciones de tutela a que se refiere esta providencia el articulo 1o del Decreto 1382 de 12 de julio de 2000, por ser contrario a la Constitucion Politica conforme a lo expuesto en la parte motiva de este auto.
Segundo. ORDENASE REMITIR la accion de tutela propuesta por los ciudadanos Willinton Eduardo Pulido Ibanez y Jose Andres Mora contra la Universidad Pedagogica y Tecnologica de Colombia, al Tribunal Contencioso Administrativo de Boyaca por ser ese despacho judicial ante el cual se interpuso la accion de tutela en referencia.

Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data

Alejandro Martínez Caballero

Magistrado

✓

Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

Eduardo Montealegre Lynett

José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

Magistrado

✓

Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0

It cites no recorded decisions.

Cited by0

No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.