JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 17, 1998

A- de 1998

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Vladimiro Naranjo Mesa

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Audiencia Publica En Asunto De Revision De Tutela
  • Criterios y opiniones
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Con el presente auto se cita a audiencia pública para el día 6 de octubre de 1998 en el salón de audiencias de la Corte Constitucional, para que las personas invitadas y relacionadas en el presente proveído se sirvan exponer sus respectivos criterios y opiniones sobre el problema jurídico planteado en la tutela de la referencia.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. ORDENAR que, por Secretaría General, se cite en audiencia pública el día 6 de octubre del presente año, a las ocho y media de la mañana (8:30 a.m.), en el salón de audiencias de la Corte Constitucional, a las personas relacionadas en el considerando 4° de este Auto, para que se sirvan exponer ante esta Corporación sus respectivos criterios y opiniones sobre el problema jurídico planteado en la tutela de la referencia.
  2. Segundo. A cada expositor se le concederá el uso de la palabra por un término máximo de quince (15) minutos.
  3. Tercero. Cada uno de los expositores se servirá presentar a la Secretaría General de esta Corporación, un resumen escrito de su intervención.
  4. Notifíquese y cúmplase.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
Vladimiro Naranjo Mesa
Reporting justice
Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJosé Gregorio Hernández Galindo
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.