JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)March 28, 2011

A- de 2011

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Nilson Elías Pinilla Pinilla

✓Claimant Ana Maria Manzanares Mendez

✓
Topic · hard data
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Cumplimiento Fallo De Tutela
  • Competencia del juez de primera instancia
Corte Constitucional
  • Competencia excepcional para asegurar el cumplimiento del fallo en asuntos de gran trascendencia social
Juez
  • Competente hasta que esté completamente restablecido el derecho o eliminadas las causas de la amenaza
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de apertura de incidente de desacato de la sentencia de la referencia.

Se decide no asumir la competencia y remitir el expediente al Juzgado que conoció de la acción en primera instancia.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. NO ASUMIR la petición de iniciar incidente de desacato, presentada por la señora Ana María Manzanares Méndez.
  2. Segundo. REMITIR al Juzgado 37 Civil Municipal de Bogotá la solicitud de abrir el incidente de desacato frente a la sentencia T-204 de 2010, para que determine lo que estime pertinente.
  3. Tercero. INFORMAR a la señora solicitante esta decisión, por intermedio de la Secretaría General de esta corporación.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.