JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 11, 1996

A- de 1996

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Arango Mejía

✓Claimant Realpe Forero Aura Stella·Respondent Cajanal

✓
Topic · hard data
Nulidad Por Revivir Proceso De Tutela Concluido.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Nulidad Por Revivir Proceso De Tutela Concluido
1 topic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se decretó la nulidad de las providencias de la referencia proferidas por el Juzgado respectivo porque el despacho judicial revivió un proceso de tutela legalmente concluido.

Este hecho está expresamente consagrado como causal de nulidad.

En consecuencia, se ordenó al mencionado Juzgado dar cumplimiento al numeral tercero de la Sentencia T-353/96.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (7 points)
  1. Primero. DECRETASE la nulidad de las providencias del trece (13) de septiembre de mil novecientos noventa y seis (1996), proferidas por el Juzgado
  2. Sexto. (6o.) Laboral del Circuito de Bogota dentro del los procesos de tutela instaurados por las senoras Aura Stella Realpe Forero y Maria Elvira Verdooren de Borja, por lo expuesto en la parte motiva de esta providencia.
  3. Segundo. COMUNIQUESE esta decision al Juez
  4. Sexto. (6o.) Laboral del Circuito de Bogota.
  5. Tercero. ORDENASE al Juzgado
  6. Sexto. (6o.) Laboral del Circuito de Bogota, dar cumplimiento al numeral
  7. tercero. de la sentencia T-353 del trece (13) de agoto de mil novecientos noventa y seis (1996).
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
Jorge Arango Mejía
Reporting justice
✓
Antonio Barrera Carbonell
Magistrado
✓
Eduardo Cifuentes Muñoz
Magistrado
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.