JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)February 15, 2017

A- de 2017

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alberto Rojas Ríos

✓Claimant Gloria Marcela Abadia Cubillos

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Solicitud De Nulidad Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Negar por cuanto no se incurrió en ninguna de las causales invocadas
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de nulidad de la Sentencia T-151/16.

La Directora de Política Criminal y Penitenciaria del Ministerio de Justicia y del Derecho aduce que la precitada providencia incurrió en yerros por desconocimiento del precedente constitucional y por incongruencia entre la parte motiva y resolutiva.

Tras comprobar que la providencia cuestionada no incurrió en los errores procesales alegados, se decide NEGAR la nulidad invocada.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. NEGAR la solicitud de nulidad de la Sentencia T-151 de 2016, proferida por la Sala Octava de Revision de Tutelas de la Corte Constitucional, formulada por Gloria Marcela Abadia Cubillos en calidad de Directora de Politica Criminal y Penitenciaria del Ministerio de Justicia y Derecho.
  2. SEGUNDO. ADVERTIR a quien ha interpuesto el presente incidente que contra la presente decision no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.