JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)March 11, 2014

A- de 2014

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Ernesto Vargas Silva

✓Claimant Rodrigo Salas Mejia Vs Colpensiones

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Decreto 1382 de 2000 no establece competencia sino reglas de simple reparto
  • Normas que determinan la competencia
Accion De Tutela Contra Colpensiones
  • Competencia de Juzgado Civil del Circuito
Corte Constitucional
  • Competencia para dirimir conflictos de competencia
  • Competencia residual cuando autoridades judiciales carezcan de superior jerárquico común
5 topics · 7 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Conflicto de Competencia suscitado entre el Juzgado Tercero Administrativo Oral del Circuito de Montería y el Juzgado Tercero Civil del Circuito de Bucaramanga, en torno al trámite de la acción de tutela de la referencia.

Luego de reiterar el marco jurídico que determina la competencia en materia de tutela y de analizar el caso en concreto, la Sala Plena decide el caso ordenando remitir el expediente al Juzgado Civil del Circuito de Bucaramanga, para que avoque de manera inmediata el conocimiento de la acción de tutela deprecada.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (6 points)
  1. Primero. DEJAR SIN EFECTO el auto proferido por el Juzgado
  2. Tercero. Civil del Circuito de Bucaramanga el 4 de febrero de 2014, dentro del expediente ICC-1975.
  3. Segundo. REMITIR al Juzgado
  4. Tercero. Civil del Circuito de Bucaramanga el expediente ICC-1975, para que avoque de manera inmediata el conocimiento del asunto y adopte sin mas retardo la decision de merito a que haya lugar, dentro de la accion de tutela promovida por el senor Rodrigo Salas Mejia, quien actua a traves de apoderado judicial, contra Colpensiones.
  5. Tercero. Por la Secretaria General de la Corte, COMUNICAR al Juzgado
  6. Tercero. Administrativo Oral del Circuito Judicial de Monteria, la decision adoptada en esta providencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.