JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 9, 1998

A- de 1998

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Eduardo Cifuentes Muñoz

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencias.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Jueces de una misma categoría pero de distinta localidad
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se inhibió de conocer del conflicto negativo de competencia suscitado entre dos Juzgados Civiles del Circuito por carecer de competencia, toda vez que la Corte consideró que el competente para dirimir el conflicto suscitado es la Sala de Casación Civil de la Corte Suprema de Justicia.

En consecuencia, ordenó remitir el expediente a la mencionada Sala para que resuelva el conflicto de competencia negativo presentado.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (6 points)
  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Corte Constitucional, en Sala Plena
  2. R E S U E L V E
  3. Primero. INHIBIRSE de conocer del conflicto negativo de competencia suscitado entre los juzgados 25 Civil del Circuito de Bogota y 1 Civil del Circuito de Popayan, por carecer de competencia.
  4. Segundo. Ordenar a la Secretaria General de la Corporacion que se remita el expediente a la Sala de Casacion Civil de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, para que resuelva el conflicto de competencia negativo entre los juzgados 25 Civil del Circuito de Bogota y 1 Civil del Circuito de Popayan.
  5. Tercero. Contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno.
  6. Comuniquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.