A- de 2013
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Mauricio González Cuervo
✓Claimant Eduardo Rincon Herrera Y Otros·Respondent Sin Información
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Requisito de pertinencia
- Rechazar por falta de pertinencia por ausencia de legitimidad del recusante
- Casos en que no resulta pertinente
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Recusación.
Con el presente auto la Sala decide RECHAZAR por falta de pertinencia de los escritos recusatorios presentados por los diferentes memorialistas en contra del Magistrado Jorge Ignacio Pretelt Chaljub, por ausencia de legitimidad de los recusantes.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- PRIMERO. Rechazar por falta de pertinencia de los escritos recusatorios presentados por los ciudadanos Eduardo Rincon Herrera, Oscar Duenas Ruiz, Alberto Pardo Barrios y Orlando Restrepo Pulgarin, contra el Magistrado Ponente Jorge Ignacio Pretelt Chaljub, por ausencia de legitimidad de los recusantes.
- SEGUNDO. Contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.