JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)May 17, 2000

A- de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Eduardo Cifuentes Muñoz

✓Claimant Martha Libia Noreña

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencias
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia De Tutela
  • Jueces de una misma jurisdicción y distintos distritos judiciales
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se ordenó remitir el expediente a la Corte Suprema de Justicia para que resuelva el conflicto de competencia suscitado entre dos Juzgados de Familia de Medellín y de Bogotá, toda vez que le corresponde dirimir el asunto por ser su superior jerárquico común.

También se ordenó enviar copia de esta providencia a la Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria del Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura de Antioquia para que adelante la actuación disciplinaria correspondiente.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (7 points)
  1. Primero. Ordenar que por Secretaria General se remita a la Corte Suprema de Justicia, Sala de Casacion Civil y Agraria, para que ella resuelva el conflicto de competencia suscitado entre los Juzgados Once de Familia de Medellin y
  2. Primero. de Familia de Santa Fe de Bogota.
  3. Segundo. Ordenar que por Secretaria General se remita copia de la presente decision al Juzgado
  4. primero. de familia de Santa Fe de Bogota.
  5. Tercero. Ordenar que por Secretaria General se remita copia de esta providencia a la Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria del Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura de Antioquia, para que, si a ello hubiere lugar, adelante la actuacion disciplinaria correspondiente.
  6. Cuarto. Contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno.
  7. Comuniquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.