A- de 1995
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo
✓Claimant Jaime Enrique Lozano
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Alcance del control
- Rechazo
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Se confirmó el auto proferido por la Corte Constitucional por medio del cual se rechazó la demanda instaurada por el accionante de la referencia contra los artículos 29 y 30 de la Ley 40 de 1993, toda vez que las disposiciones acusadas ya habían sido objeto de resolución definitiva y absoluta mediante varias sentencias que hicieron tránsito a cosa juzgada constitucional.
El asunto está fallado.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
See the operative part (4 points)
- Primero. CONFIRMAR el auto proferido por el H. Magistrado Carlos Gaviria Díaz el 2 de noviembre de 1995, por medio del cual se rechazó la demanda instaurada por el ciudadano JAIME ENRIQUE LOZANO contra los artículos 29 y 30 de la Ley 40 de 1993.
- Segundo. Archívese el expediente.
- Tercero. Contra esta providencia no cabe recurso alguno.
- Cópiese, notifíquse, comuníquese,
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.