JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)November 30, 1995

A- de 1995

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero

✓Claimant Max Rangel Fuentes Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Procedimiento De Desacato En Tutela. Colision Negativa De Competencia.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

3 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se ordena dirimir la colisión negativa de competencia planteada por el Tribunal de la referencia, ya que es el juez de primera instancia el único que puede tramitar el desacato instaurado por la accionante.

En consecuencia, la Corte exhortó remitir el expediente al citado Tribunal para que tramite el incidente de desacato de la tutela.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. Dirimir la colisión negativa de competencia planteada por el Tribunal Superior de Barranquilla, Sala Penal, en el sentido de señalar dicho Tribunal Superior de Barranquilla -Sala Penal- como el competente para tramitar el desacato instaurado por Celina Esther Rolong Ariza.
  2. SEGUNDO. En consecuencia, se ordena a la Secretaría de la Corte Constitucional que remita el expediente al citado Tribunal para que tramite el referido incidente.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.