A- de 2020
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Cristina Pardo Schlesinger
✓Claimant Edgar Antonio Ahumada Sabogal
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Rechazar por extemporánea
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Solicitud de nulidad de la Sentencia SU.397/19.
El fundamento del incidente fue el desconocimiento del precedente desarrollo en las Sentencias C-792/14 y SU.215/16.
Teniendo en cuenta que la nulidad impetrada no cumplió con la exigencia de temporalidad al ser presentada por fuera del vencimiento del término de ejecutoria, la Corte Constitucional decidió RECHAZARLA
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- PRIMERO. RECHAZAR la solicitud de nulidad de la Sentencia SU-397 de 2019, presentada por el apoderado judicial del señor Édgar Antonio Ahumada Sabogal.
- SEGUNDO. Por intermedio de la Secretaría General de la Corte Constitucional, COMUNICAR la presente providencia a las partes.
- TERCERO. Contra esta decisión no procede recurso alguno.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.