JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)March 8, 2005

A- de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Araujo Rentería

✓Claimant German Becerra Roncancio

✓
Topic · hard data
Recurso De Suplica Interpuesto Contra El Auto Del 17 De Febrero De 2005, Proferido Por La Magistrada Sustanciadora, Doctora Clara Ines Vargas Hernández, Que Rechazo La Demanda. Confirmar El Auto De Rechazo De La Demanda
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Requisitos mínimos
  • Rechazo por no haberse subsanado
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. RESUELVE:
  2. CONFIRMAR el auto dictado el 17 de Febrero de 2005 por la Magistrada Sustanciadora, Dra. Clara Inés Vargas Hernández, por medio del cual rechazó la demanda de inconstitucionalidad promovida por el ciudadano Germán Becerra Roncancio en el proceso de la referencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.