JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)February 21, 2007

A- de 2007

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Daniel Molina Angarita Vs. Juez De Primera Instancia, Fuerza Naval Del Caribe

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Juzgado Segundo Civil Del Circuito De Cucuta, El Juzgado Segundo Civil Del Circuito De Cartagena  Y El Juzgado Promiscuo Del Circuito Del Carmen De Bolivar. Ordena Remitir El Expediente Al Juzgado Segundo Civil Del Circuito De Cartagena
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Contra Fuerza Naval Del Caribe
  • Remisión expediente para su conocimiento y resolución con el apremio de los términos constitucionales
  • Competencia a prevención del Juez Civil del Circuito
Conflicto Negativo De Competencia
  • Declaración de reo ausente y condena dentro de un proceso judicial de persona vinculada a las Fuerzas Militares
Competencia A Prevención En Tutela
  • Lugar donde ocurrió amenaza o vulneración de derechos fundamentales o donde se produjeron sus efectos
3 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Remitir, por intermedio de Secretaria General, el expediente de la referencia al Juzgado
  2. Segundo. Civil del Circuito de Cartagena, para que en ejercicio de sus competencias constitucionales y legales, y dentro de los terminos establecidos, decida la accion de tutela de Daniel Molina Angarita contra el Juzgado de Primera Instancia, Fuerza Naval del Caribe.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.