JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)February 24, 2015

A- de 2015

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Guillermo Guerrero Pérez

✓Claimant Javier·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de cumplimiento de la sentencia T-115/14.

El memorialista le pide a la Sala de Revisión la asunción de la competencia para conocer el incidente de cumplimiento del referido fallo, toda vez que el cese de actividades a consecuencia del llamado “paro judicial” en el año 2014, constituye una justificación objetiva, razonable y suficiente para demostrar que el juez de primera instancia no ha logrado adoptar las medidas que hagan efectiva la orden de protección emitida por la Corte.

Luego de analizar la situación, la Sala decide no asumir el trámite de cumplimiento solicitado.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. NO ASUMIR el tramite de la solicitud de cumplimiento de la sentencia T-115 de 2014 elevado por el senor Javier.
  2. Segundo. A traves de la Secretaria General de esta Corporacion, REMITIR al Juzgado 55 Civil Municipal de Bogota la solicitud de cumplimiento de la sentencia T-115 de 2014, para que determine lo de su competencia.
  3. Tercero. Por medio de la Secretaria General de esta Corte, INFORMAR a las partes en el proceso T-115 de 2014 del contenido del presente Auto y del tramite otorgado a la solicitud.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.