JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)February 20, 2008

A- de 2008

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Clara Inés Vargas Hernández

✓Claimant Rafael Angel Diaz Marin Vs. Tribunal Superior Del Distrito Judicial De Cali

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Suscitado Entre El Juzgado Quince Administrativo De Cali Y La Sala De Casacion Laboral De La Corte Suprema De Justicia. Ordena Remitir El Expediente Al Juzgado Quince Administrativo Del Circuito De Cali, Para Que Adelante La Correspondiente Actuacion Judicial.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Contra Tribunal Superior
  • Competencia de Juzgado Administrativo del Circuito dentro de proceso de selección para cargo de contralor
Decreto Reglamentario De Competencia Para Reparto De Accion De Tutela
  • Aplicación
  • Inaplicación
  • Efectos inter pares a su inaplicación
Acción De Tutela
  • Actuación de autoridad judicial no tendría carácter jurisdiccional por tratarse de acto administrativo de carácter general dentro de proceso de selección para cargo de contralor
Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Superior jerárquico común
Conflicto De Competencia
  • Aplicación de la excepción de inconstitucionalidad con efectos inter pares
Corte Constitucional
  • Conocimiento de la acción de tutela cuando autoridades judiciales carecen de superior jerárquico común
8 topics · 10 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. REMITIR el expediente al Juzgado Quince Administrativo del Circuito de Cali, para que adelante la correspondiente actuacion judicial.
  2. SEGUNDO. Comuniquese al la Sala de Casacion Laboral de la H. Corte Suprema de Justicia, lo aqui resuelto.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.