JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)March 7, 2013

A- de 2013

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Guillermo Guerrero Pérez

✓Claimant Sebastian Lopez Betancourt·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Contra Penitenciaria En Materia De Libre Desarrollo De La Personalidad De Interno
  • Rechazar solicitud extensión de efectos de sentencia T-750/03 por improcedente por cuanto pretende su modificación
Sentencias De Tutela
  • Efectos inter partes
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

El memorialista le pide a la Corte Constitucional extenderle a él y a toda la población reclusa que se encuentre en las mismas condiciones del accionante de la sentencia T-750/03, los efectos de la misma.

Teniendo en cuenta que la Corporación ya perdió competencia sobre el asunto decidido en la sentencia de la referencia y al no ser posible ahora modular sus efectos, la Sala de Revisión decide RECHAZAR la petición de extensión de efectos de la sentencia T-750/03, por improcedente. -

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. RESUELVE:
  2. RECHAZAR la petición de extensión de efectos de la sentencia T-750 de 2003, formulada por el señor Sebastián López Betancourth, por ser improcedente.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.