JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)February 4, 2009

A- de 2009

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Sala Plena

✓Claimant Diego Hernando Roa Cortez Vs. Sala Penal Del Tribunal Superior De Ibague Y La Sala De Casacion Penal De La Corte Suprema De Justicia

✓
Topic · hard data
En El Caso De La Referencia, Se Determino La Inexistencia De Un Conflicto Negativo De Competencia, Y Por Ende, Se Decidio Devolver El Expediente Contentivo De La Accion De Tutela Precitada A La Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria Del Consejo Superior Dela Judicatura
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto Negativo De Competencia
  • Manifestación expresa de distintos despachos judiciales de no asumir el conocimiento
Accion De Tutela Contra Tribunal Superior Y Corte Suprema De Justicia
  • Competencia del Consejo Superior de la Judicatura ante inexistencia de conflicto negativo de competencia
Acción De Tutela
  • Competencia para el conocimiento y trámite se encuentra regulada en la ley
Corte Suprema De Justicia
  • Cambio de jurisprudencia de Sala de Casación para admitir acción de tutela contra sus sentencias no afecta la competencia
5 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. DEVOLVER por Secretaria General de esta corporacion a la Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria del Consejo Superior de la Judicatura el expediente que contiene la accion de tutela incoada por Diego Hernando Roa
  2. Cortes en contra la Sala Penal del Tribunal Superior de Ibague y de la Sala de Casacion Penal de la Corte Suprema de Justicia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.