JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)May 9, 2000

A- de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitud De Alcance De La Tutela T-297/00.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se rechazó por improcedente la solicitud elevada por los ciudadanos de la referencia, toda vez que la Corte Constitucional profirió la Sentencia T-297/00 en la cual se pronunció respecto de las peticiones contenidas en los expedientes relacionados en la providencia, agotando en consecuencia, la competencia funcional de esta Corporación.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Rechazar por improcedente, la solicitud elevada por los ciudadanos José Manuel Pulido Galindo, Rufino Amalio Suárez Tapia y, por la Asociación de Pensionados de la Industria del Transporte Marítimo y Fluvial de Colombia de la Flota Mercante Gran Colombiana S.A. Asopenmar-Colombia-, por las razones expresadas en la parte motiva de esta providencia.
  2. Segundo. Para los fines pertinentes, remítase a Secretaría junto con esta providencia, los memoriales a que ella se refiere.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.