JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)February 14, 2007

A- de 2007

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Nilson Elías Pinilla Pinilla

✓Claimant Luz Stella Rivera Como Agente Oficiosa Vs. Hospital Universitario Evaristo Garcia De Cali

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencias Entre El Juzgado Segundo Civil Del Circuito De Buga Y El Juzgado Administrativo Del Circuito De Buga.Ordena Remitir El Expediente Al Juzgado Segundo Civil Del Circuito De Buga
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto Negativo De Competencia
  • Alusión tanto a la acción de cumplimiento como a la de tutela
  • Discrepancia sobre la naturaleza de la acción presentada
Accion De Cumplimiento
  • Improcedencia para protección de derechos garantizados por tutela
Accion De Tutela Contra Hospital Universitario
  • Competencia del Juzgado Civil del Circuito
Acción De Tutela
  • Protección de derechos fundamentales
6 topics · 8 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Remitir el expediente de la referencia, por intermedio de la Secretaria General, al Juzgado
  2. Segundo. Civil del Circuito de Buga, para que en ejercicio de sus competencias constitucionales y legales, tramite y decida la accion de tutela instaurada por Luz Stella Rivera, en calidad de agente oficiosa de su progenitora Oliva Serna, contra el Hospital Universitario Evaristo Garcia de Cali.
  3. Informese esta decision, ademas al Juzgado Administrativo del Circuito de Buga.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.