JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)July 28, 1999

A- de 1999

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero

✓Claimant Diogenes Arrieta Saenz

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitud De Aclaracion De La Sentencia Su.360/99.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Sentencia De Revision De Tutela
  • Improcedencia de aclaración o adición
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se negó la presente solicitud porque la Corte consideró que el Alcalde de la Localidad de Santafé no puede pedir ninguna aclaración ni adición sobre el fallo SU.360/99 ya que para dicha providencia no procede, toda vez que los fallos de la Corte Constitucional no admiten ni adición, ni aclaración, salvo que haya habido errores de mecanografía o de transcripción.

Además, en el caso concreto se aprecia que la Sentencia es suficientemente clara tanto en la parte motiva como en las órdenes que da.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional
  2. RESUELVE
  3. NEGAR la presente solicitud. El Alcalde de la Localidad de Santafe no puede pedir ninguna aclaracion ni adicion sobre el fallo SU-360/99 ya que para dicha providencia no procede.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.