A- de 2016
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Gabriel Eduardo Mendoza Martelo
✓Claimant Edgardo Jose Maya Villazon
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Negar por cuanto la parte resolutiva no ofrece ninguna duda alegada por el accionante
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Solicitud de aclaración de la Sentencia C-618/15 presentada por el Contralor General de la República.
Considera la Corte que la parte resolutiva de la mencionada sentencia corresponde a la controversia suscitada, la cual fue resuelta a propósito de la demanda.
En consecuencia, estima que a ella son ajenas las dudas planteadas en la solicitud de aclaración.
DENEGADA.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. NEGAR la solicitud de aclaracion de la sentencia C-618 de 2015, presentada por el senor Contralor General de la Republica.
- Segundo. Contra este Auto no procede recurso alguno.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.