JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)February 4, 2009

A- de 2009

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Nilson Elías Pinilla Pinilla

✓Claimant Maria Fanny Aristizabal De Alzate Vs. Nueva Eps

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Suscitado Entre El Juzgado Dieciseis Penal Municipal Con Funciones De Control De Garantias De Medellin Y El Juzgado Veintiocho Penal Del Circuito Con Funciones De Conocimiento De Medellin. La Sala Sostuvo Que La Naturaleza De La Empresa Nueva Eps Corresponde A La De Una Sociedad Anonima, Por Tanto, Una Entidad Del Sector Descentralizado Por Servicios Del Orden Nacional. Se Resolvio La Remision Del Expediente De La Referencia Al Juzgado Veintiocho Penal Del Circuito Con Funciones De Conocimiento De Medellin Para Su Tramite Y Decision.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Contra La Nueva Eps
  • Competencia de Juzgado Penal del Circuito con Funciones de Conocimiento
  • Conocimiento directo de la Corte Constitucional en aras de garantizar sin más dilación el acceso a la administración de justicia
Nueva Eps
  • Naturaleza jurídica
5 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Remitir el expediente de la referencia, por intermedio de la Secretaria General, al Juzgado Dieciseis Penal Municipal con Funcion de Garantias de Medellin, para que en ejercicio de sus competencias constitucionales y legales, tramite y decida la accion de tutela instaurada por la senora Maria Fanny Aristizabal de Alzate contra "la Nueva EPS".
  2. Informese esta decision, ademas, al Juzgado Veintiocho Penal del Circuito con Funciones de Conocimiento de Medellin.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.