JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)February 28, 2005

A- de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Araujo Rentería

✓Claimant Reinaldo Mosquera Medina

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitud De Cumplimiento De La Sentencia T-800/99 Correspondiente Al Proceso De Tutela T-217073 Y Del Auto No. 127 Del 23 De Agosto De 2004 Dictado Por La Sala Primera De Revisión De La Corte Constitucional. Rechazar Por Improcedente La Solicitud De Cumplimiento
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Sentencia De Tutela
  • Rechazo solicitud cumplimiento de la sentencia T-800/99 por improcedente
  • Existencia de otros medios de defensa judicial distinto del trámite de cumplimiento de sentencias
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. RECHAZAR por improcedente la solicitud de cumplimiento de la sentencia T - 800 de 1999 y del Auto número 127 del 23 de agosto de 2004 dictado por la Sala Primera de Revisión de la Corte Constitucional, formulada por el señor Reinaldo Mosquera Medina el día quince (15) de octubre de 2004.
  2. Segundo. ORDENAR a la Secretaría General de esta Corporación que remita dicha solicitud, junto con sus anexos y con el presente Auto, al Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura del Huila - Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria, para que obre en el expediente respectivo.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.