JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)February 23, 2010

A- de 2010

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice María Victoria Calle Correa

✓Claimant Jose Milton Carreño Peralta Y Otros·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Contra Alcaldia Municipal
  • Denegar solicitud de acompañamiento al incidente de desacato en sentencia T-544/09
Procuraduría General De La Nación
  • Competencia para someter a vigilancia expedientes de procesos judiciales cuando sea necesario
Incidente De Desacato
  • Competencia del juez de primera instancia
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud acompañamiento trámite incidente de desacato.

La Sala decide denegar la solicitud impetrada de acompañamiento al incidente de desacato con ocasión de las órdenes impartidas en la sentencia T-544/09.

Se dispone entregar copia del auto a los peticionarios y correr traslado de la solicitud a la Procuraduría General de la Nación.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. DENEGAR la solicitud de acompañamiento al incidente de desacato con ocasión de las órdenes impartidas en la Sentencia T-544 de 2009.
  2. Segundo. ENTREGAR COPIA de la presente providencia a los ciudadanos José Milton Carreño Peralta, Leonardo Fabio Polanco y Alfonso Monitel Callejas, y DAR TRASLADO de su escrito a la Procuraduría General de la Nación.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.