A- de 2015
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice María Victoria Calle Correa
✓Claimant Angelo Felipe De Sales Martinez
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Rechazar por cuanto lo que se pretendía con la demanda era volver a someter a control constitucional un texto normativo que ya fue examinado en su integridad por la Corporación
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Recurso de súplica interpuesto en contra del auto que rechazó la demanda de la referencia, porque en relación con la norma acusada operó el fenómeno de la cosa juzgada absoluta.
Para la Sala Plena, lo que se pretendía con la demanda es volver a someter a control constitucional un texto normativo que ya fue examinado en su integridad por la Corporación, en la Sentencia C-029/09.
Se CONFIRMA el auto recurrido.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. CONFIRMAR el auto del seis (6) de marzo de dos mil catorce (2014), proferido por el magistrado Luis Ernesto Vargas Silva, dentro del proceso D-10134.
- Segundo. COMUNICAR el contenido de esta decision al recurrente, informandole que contra ella no procede recurso alguno.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.