JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)February 15, 2006

A- de 2006

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto

✓Claimant Isabel Almanza Sarmiento Vs. Instituto Geografico Agustin Codazzi

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Juzgado Doce Civil Municipal De Barranquilla Y El Tribunal De Lo Contencioso Administrativo Del Atlantico. Ordena Remitir El Expediente A La Oficina Judicial De La Ciudad De Barranquilla Para Que Lo Reparta A Los Juzgados Del Circuito De Dicha Ciudad
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Contra Instituto Geografico Agustin Codazi
  • Conocimiento por jueces del circuito o con categoría de tales
Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Entidad del sector descentralizado por servicios del orden nacional
  • Superior jerárquico común
  • Asunción por Corte Constitucional cuando no existe superior jerárquico común
3 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Corte Constitucional, en Sala Plena
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. Remitase el expediente contentivo de la accion de tutela propuesta por la ciudadana Isabel Almanza Sarmiento contra el Instituto Geografico Agustin Codazzi, a la Oficina Judicial de la ciudad de Barranquilla para que lo reparta a los Juzgados del Circuito de dicha ciudad. Este despacho judicial, a su vez, debera darle tramite y decidir en forma inmediata.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.