JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 9, 1997

A- de 1997

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓
Topic · hard data
Correccion Del Numeral Segundo De La Parte Resolutiva De La Sentencia C-374/97 Y Adicion De La Parte Resolutiva.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Sentencia
  • Corrección
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se realiza la corrección del numeral segundo de la parte resolutiva de la Sentencia C-374/97, toda vez que debido a un error de transcripción, dicho artículo apareció entre los que se declaraban exequibles, pese a que se ha debido declarar expresamente su inexequibilidad.

Para todos los efectos, este Auto se entenderá incorporado y deberá acompañar la Sentencia número C-374/97.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (8 points)
  1. Primero. Corregir el numeral
  2. segundo. de la parte resolutiva de la Sentencia C-374 del 13 de agosto de 1997, que debe leerse así:
  3. "
  4. Segundo. Decláranse EXEQUIBLES, en los términos de esta Sentencia, los artículos 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 10, inciso 1, 21 (parágrafo) y 24 de la Ley 333 de 1996".
  5. Segundo. Adicionar la parte resolutiva de la Sentencia C-374 del 13 de agosto de 1997 así:
  6. "
  7. Séptimo. Declárase INEXEQUIBLE el artículo 32 de la Ley 333 de 1996".
  8. Tercero. Para todos los efectos, este Auto se entenderá incorporado y deberá acompañar la Sentencia número C-374 del 13 de agosto de 1997.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.