A- de 2001
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Fabio Morón Díaz
✓Claimant Carlos Arturo Cardenas Melo
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Se ordenó inaplicar el numeral 1 del Art. 1º del Decreto 1382 de 2000 por inconstitucional.
En consecuencia, se remitió el expediente al Tribunal Superior de Santa Rosa de Viterbo, Sala Penal, para que asuma el conocimiento de la acción de tutela instaurada por el ciudadano de la referencia.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- En merito de lo expuesto la Corte Constitucional en Sala Plena,
- RESUELVE:
- En el presente caso, INAPLICAR, por inconstitucional el numeral 1 del articulo 1 del Decreto 1382 de 2000. En consecuencia, remitase el expediente al Tribunal superior de Santa Rosa de Viterbo, Sala Penal, para que asuma el conocimiento de la accion de tutela instaurada por el ciudadano CARLOS ARTURO CARDENAS MELO, contra la Sala Civil del Tribunal superior de Santa Rosa de Viterbo.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.