JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)January 23, 2016

A- de 2016

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Linares Cantillo

✓Claimant Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acto Legislativo Sobre Reforma De Equilibrio De Poderes Y Reajuste Institucional
  • Rechazar impedimento manifestado por magistrado para conocer trámite de demanda de inconstitucionalidad
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

La magistrada Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado manifestó su impedimento para conocer el trámite de la demanda de la referencia, argumentando la causal de tener interés directo en la decisión.

La Sala Plena no encontró fundado el interés directo y actual que afecte la imparcialidad de la magistrada Ortiz en el proceso D-10947 y constató que no existe una denuncia actual en su contra que tenga directa relación con la demanda, por tratarse de una reforma constitucional de gran impacto en el que el juzgamiento de los magistrados es tan solo uno de sus elementos.

Con base en lo anterior concluye, que no es pertinente desplazar la competencia de los magistrados titulares a una sala de conjueces.

Se RECHAZA.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional
  2. RESUELVE
  3. RECHAZAR el impedimento manifestado por la magistrada Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado, para intervenir y decidir sobre la demanda de inconstitucionalidad contra los articulos 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 11, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 y 26 del Acto Legislativo 02 de 2015, en el marco del proceso correspondiente al expediente D-10947.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.