A- de 2022
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Alberto Rojas Ríos
✓Claimant Enrique Gomez Martinez
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Rechazar por falta de pertinencia
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Recusación formulada en contra del Conjuez Hernando Yepes Arcila para participar en la discusión y decisión del impedimento presentado por el Magistrado Alejandro Linares Cantillo.
El memorialista cuestiona la existencia de un conflicto de intereses.
La Sala Plena de la Corporación que la recusación es impertinente por cuanto el que la formula no acredita legitimación en la causa por activa, ni son recusables los conjueces a quienes corresponda la decisión sobre impedimentos o recusaciones.
Se RECHAZA tanto la recusación como las peticiones subsidiarias invocadas.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
See the operative part (20 points)
- Primero. RECHAZAR por impertinente la recusación presentada por el ciudadano Enrique Gómez Martínez en contra del Conjuez Hernando Yepes Arcila en los procesos D-13.956 y D-13.856. Así mismo, RECHAZAR las peticiones subsidiarias.
- Segundo. Contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno.
- Comuníquese y cúmplase.
- ANTONIO JOSÉ LIZARAZO OCAMPO
- Presidente
- DIANA FAJARDO RIVERA
- Magistrada
- JORGE ENRIQUE IBÁÑEZ NAJAR
- Magistrado
- PAOLA ANDREA MENESES MOSQUERA
- Magistrada
- GLORIA STELLA ORTIZ DELGADO
- Magistrada
- CRISTINA PARDO SCHLESINGER
- Magistrada
- JOSÉ FERNANDO REYES CUARTAS
- Magistrado
- ALBERTO ROJAS RÍOS
- Magistrado
- MARTHA VICTORIA SÁCHICA MÉNDEZ
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.