JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)February 7, 2007

A- de 2007

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Clara Inés Vargas Hernández

✓Claimant Melba Ofir Casas Peña Vs. Centrales Electricas Del Cauca S.A. Cedelca

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Juzgado Segundo Administrativo De Popayan Y El Juzgado Sexto Civil Municipal De Popayan. Ordena Remitir El Expediente Al Juzgado Segundo Administrativo De Popayan
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Decreto Reglamentario De Competencia Para Reparto De Accion De Tutela
  • Aplicación
  • Inaplicación
  • Efectos inter pares a su inaplicación
Empresa De Servicios Publicos Cedelca
  • Naturaleza jurídica
  • Entidad descentralizada por servicios del orden nacional según Ley 489 de 1998
Conflicto De Competencia Aparente
  • Competencia de la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional
Conflicto De Competencia
  • Aplicación de la excepción de inconstitucionalidad con efectos inter pares
6 topics · 9 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. REMITIR el expediente al Juzgado
  2. Segundo. Administrativo de Popayan para que adelante la correspondiente actuacion judicial.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.