A- de 2019
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Alberto Rojas Ríos
✓Claimant Consulado De Colombia En Hong Kong
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Rechazar por extemporánea
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Solicitud de aclaración de la Sentencia T-500/17, formulada por el Consulado General de Colombia en Hong Kong.
El memorialista adujo que existen múltiples inquietudes respecto al fallo de la referencia, debido a la actual y creciente población carcelaria colombiana en la Región Administrativa Especial de la República Popular China.
Luego de verificar que la petición de aclaración fue presentada de manera extemporánea, la Sala de Revisión decidió RECHAZARLA.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
- RESUELVE
- Primero. RECHAZAR, por extemporaneidad, la solicitud de aclaracion de la Sentencia T-500 de 2017, expediente T-6.080.803, formulada por el Consulado de Colombia en Hong Kong.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.