JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)June 7, 1995

A- de 1995

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓Claimant Carlos Gomez Olaya

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se declara que el Tribunal de la referencia, en su calidad de superior jerárquico común, es competente para decidir sobre el conflicto de competencias negativo, surgido entre dos Juzgados Penal del Circuito y Civil del Circuito.

En consecuencia, se ordena enviar el expediente al mencionado Tribunal para que defina el conflicto de competencias entre los Juzgados citados.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (6 points)
  1. Primero. DECLARAR que el H. Tribunal del Distrito Judicial de Cundinamarca, en su calidad de superior jerárquico común, es competente para decidir sobre el conflicto de competencias negativo, surgido entre los Juzgados
  2. Tercero. Penal del Circuito y
  3. Primero. Civil del Circuito de Facatativá.
  4. Segundo. ORDENAR el envío del expediente al H. Tribunal del Distrito Judicial de Cundinamarca, para que defina el conflicto de competencias entre los Juzgados
  5. Tercero. Penal del Circuito y
  6. Primero. Civil del Circuito de Facatativá.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.