JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)February 15, 2012

A- de 2012

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice María Victoria Calle Correa

✓Claimant Ricardo Cifuentes Salamanca·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Aclaracion Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Declaración de inexequibilidad en sentencia C-113/93
  • Procedencia dentro del término de ejecutoria, de oficio o a solicitud de parte respecto de conceptos o frases contenidas en la parte resolutiva o que influyan en ella
Corte Constitucional
  • Incompetencia para resolver consultas e interrogatorios ya que su función es jurisdiccional y no consultiva
  • Fallos que dicte en ejercicio del control jurisdiccional hacen tránsito a cosa juzgada constitucional
4 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de aclaración de la sentencia C-911/11.

La Corte constata que la solicitud de aclaración no fue formulada oportunamente y al establecer la extemporaneidad de la petición declara la improcedencia de la misma.

Se decide RECHAZAR la solicitud de aclaración elevada..

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. RECHAZAR por improcedente la solicitud de aclaracion formulada por el ciudadano Ricardo Cifuentes Salamanca con respecto a la sentencia C-911 de 2011.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.